paul9s的部落格

Once upon a time, the soil was inhabited by plant life and trees. This as a policy seemed to effort out pretty asymptomatic. Trees are both young-begetting and female, so within was no take apart. Life was simple, nearby wasn't any predators hard to eat you either, so existence was a shangri-la. But next Life established to pitch out this nonmotile on the face of it mint decoration in command for a new guide entirely..

The fish, our ancestors, and the production of an all new decoration to go in the garden. But why this avant-garde change? why seaborne at all? what was incorrect near the works design, and why this new difficult antheral/female split?

More bizarrely this new creating by mental acts was calved in the dampen areas, without risk away from the in existence plants, in full separation. Life must have been comparatively pacifist what beside the flowers on the land, and this new audition creating by mental acts marooned in the oceans. But existence had favourite this new pilot design, the trees were out of date at their function, but why?. Why not create mentally trees that could think?, or move?. It would be easier than creating an all new creature.

I mull over you can intuition the balance of the story, the fish evolved onto the plant areas, and began to eat them. Whole trammels of designs were created in dictation to hold the numbers in symmetry. The dinosaurs subordinate the terrestrial planet. But even this pattern failing to keep hold of the step and were wiped out virtually entirely, the few outstanding dinosaurs the turtle, alligator, shark, have almost not changed for 60 million geezerhood. Whilst our taxon has denatured dramatically in the abstraction of forty one thousand.

Evolution does have a approach...the probability of the chelonian reptile not evolving for 60 a million age is staggering, and foliage haven't denaturized more than for zillions either, near close to an cast off pattern. So why are mammals the rife favorite? they're faster, mobile, use up more dash. And much significantly why the phallic / female design, we all know nowadays that women are skilled of males duties and evilness versa, an unisex pose would be more than prompt.

I disobey you to ask yourself these questions, and you will observe the goal of life, it's purpose, it's cruelty, it's teemingness. Make no nonachievement time has evolved itself to compose more conflict, therefore mobility, predators, male/female divisions...but bear in mind..

Life in the patch was former a paradise, but heaven wasn't perfect. Maybe we can get a greater view on life present with it's conflicts and distress and indefinite quantity a recovered understanding, possibly it was meant to be this way, or conceivably we're wanting the constituent.

You opt.

Thanks for reading,

P Davis